Guide for therapists

    Measurement-based care with the PHQ-9 and GAD-7: what they measure, how often, and how to read change

    Updated 28 October 2026

    Measurement-based care means giving a short, validated questionnaire routinely, before or during sessions, looking at the score with the client, and using it to decide whether to keep going or change course. The PHQ-9 measures how severe depression symptoms have been over the past two weeks (0 to 27); the GAD-7 does the same for anxiety (0 to 21). Read change against the client’s own starting point, look for a trend over several sessions rather than one score, and treat every score as one piece of information beside your clinical judgement.

    The Measures tab in Olive Grove for a fictional client: PHQ-9 results listed with their dates and severity, and a chart of the scores over time.

    What the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 measure

    Both are short self-report questionnaires about the past two weeks. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), and the item scores are added up. The bands below are the ones reported in the original validation papers.

    AspectPHQ-9GAD-7
    MeasuresDepression severity: the nine depression criteria of the diagnostic manual of the timeGeneralised anxiety severity
    Range0 to 270 to 21
    Bands5 mild, 10 moderate, 15 moderately severe, 20 severe5 mild, 10 moderate, 15 severe
    As a screen10 or more: 88% sensitivity and 88% specificity for major depression10 or more: 89% sensitivity and 82% specificity for generalised anxiety disorder
    Validated in6,000 primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology patients2,740 primary care patients
    • A score is not a diagnosis. A high score says a clinical assessment is worth doing; it does not replace one.
    • PHQ-9 item 9 asks about thoughts of being better off dead or of self-harm. Any answer above 0 calls for a follow-up risk assessment by you, whatever the total.
    • Use a version in the client’s language that has been translated and checked, rather than translating on the spot.

    How often to give them

    Lewis and colleagues define measurement-based care as the systematic evaluation of symptoms before or during an encounter to inform treatment, and report that it is used by fewer than one in five behavioural health practitioners. They list the best timing as an open research question. In practice, clinicians tend to choose one of these rhythms and keep to it:

    • At intake, to set a starting point.
    • Every session, or every few sessions, while the work is active. A rhythm the client can count on matters more than the exact interval.
    • At reviews of the treatment plan, so the goals and the scores are read together.
    • At the end of care, to see where the client finished.

    Give the score back. Showing the client their own trend, and asking whether it matches how they feel, is part of the method, and it is often where the useful conversation starts.

    How to read change

    • Compare with the client’s own starting point, not with other clients.
    • Look for a trend across several scores. One higher week after a hard event says less than three sessions moving the same way.
    • Ask whether the change is bigger than the measure’s own noise. Jacobson and Truax proposed the reliable change index for this: a change counts as reliable when it is larger than measurement error alone would explain.
    • Ask whether it is clinically significant. In the same paper, that means the client has moved out of the range typical of people seeking help and towards the range typical of people who are not.
    • When scores stall or worsen, treat it as a prompt to review the plan with the client, and with supervision or consultation where that helps.

    How Olive Grove helps

    Olive Grove has 13 questionnaires built in, the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 among them, scored with their severity as you fill them in, in the session or from the client’s file. Every result is kept, and Score over time draws the trend. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are prompted again every 4 sessions by default, a rhythm you can change, and item 9 of the PHQ-9 opens a safety review that asks you to confirm the action you took. Clients can also answer the PHQ-9 or GAD-7 online before their first session.

    See Give a questionnaire and track scores, Measures due and safety flags, The 13 measures and how they are scored and Clients and records.

    Common questions

    Sources

    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613. doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    2. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097. doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    3. Lewis CC, Boyd M, Puspitasari A, et al. (2019). Implementing measurement-based care in behavioral health: a review. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(3), 324-335. doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329
    4. Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12-19. doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12

    This guide is general information for clinicians, not legal or clinical advice about a particular client. What applies to you depends on where you practise and on your regulator or professional body.

    Olive Grove: notes drafted on your own computer

    It transcribes the session, offers short cues from your approach, and drafts the note in your format, with its AI running on your computer.